Julien Niset

@frangio I agree that the spec of EIP-2612 should be clarified to include EIP-1271 signatures as being valid. I had raised that issue a while ago (https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/2613#issuecomment-712663371) and mentioned it...

Note that for the moment there is no access to an equivalent to `block.timestamp` in Cairo. But it is on their roadmap.

The point of the exercise is for you to figure it out ;-)