Jukka Rissanen
Jukka Rissanen
There is something wrong with CI so we cannot see test runs. Anyway, I tried to run some of our raw tests manually and at least `af_packet` test fails ```...
> Could you pls share some knowledge why proto 0x22f0 should receive proto 0x0800 (ETH IP) pkt? Indeed, that is a good point and it really looks like our test...
> Needs clarification here that is zephyr using socket protocol as little-endian or big-endian? The talking about little-endian / big-endian is really confusing when working with networking. We should talk...
After looking the packet(7) socket documentation at https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/packet.7.html, it seems that the protocol field needs to be network byte order for the packet sockets. The documentation talks only about `htons(ETH_P_ALL)`...
This would be useful to have in 3.7 as it fixes compilation issues in certain configurations. It is also easier for future backports if this is merged to 3.7.
@MaochenWang1 could you check the CI documentation issue so we could try to get this to 3.7
Please fix the commit subjects, now they are all the same which is not good. The commit subject should indicate what the commit is changing.
> it seems that only squashed PRs are merged, so the history of a PR seems to be irrelevant. This is definitely not true, the commit history is very much...
ping @jvasanth1
I was hoping a proper issue instead of pressing the "convert to issue" button as this just copies the first question to an issue. Lot of relevant information missing now....