jugglinmike

Results 223 comments of jugglinmike

Thanks for the report! For tail-call optimization, [Test262 maintains a special value called `$MAX_ITERATIONS`](https://github.com/tc39/test262/blob/46f165ae490de7f1343165ab8d228db81eaa02c5/harness/tcoHelper.js) which authors can use to set an abstract upper boundary on the number of stack frames...

@rwaldron Thanks! Do you mean introducing `$LARGE_ARRAY_LENGTH` or removing code intended to place stress on resource limitations?

@lee-dohm @maxbrunsfeld This patch can no longer be merged to do conflicting changes on the master branch. I can see about resolving them, but are you still interested in integrating...

@lee-dohm @maxbrunsfeld this patch was meant as a follow-up to [our discussion in the language-javascript project](https://github.com/atom/language-javascript/issues/593). Is there someone else I should be talking to about it?

> > How can we parse script code? I haven't been able to find documentation for > > determining the top-level parsing goal, though it seems like it currently >...

I'm interested in [bringing this functionality to WebDriver BiDi](https://github.com/w3c/webdriver-bidi/issues/384). Whether it belongs here in WebDriver "classic" is not a topic I can comment on, but I'm interested in learning if...

Hi there, @romulocintra! We reviewed this patch during the Test262 maintainers' meeting yesterday. Coul you use a more declarative style? We'd prefer a set of meaningful cases with hard-coded expected...

Hi there, @sffc! I've also written reference implementations to help validate others' work, and I've even used projects from third parties along these lines. While it may be tempting to...

@tc39/test262-maintainers This is ready for another round of review!

@ms2ger I'd prefer it if you didn't push changes to my fork.