jugglinmike

The "?" operator appears about 60 times in HTML (the simple search query includes some false positives): $ grep '\s?' html/source | wc -l 60 In addition to the semantics...

Thanks, @jmdyck! As a fourth possibility about asserting normal completions, could we consider just referencing ECMA262's definition of "!" directly? As I understand the semantics, they already seem coherent from...

Thanks, @jmdyck. I can see now that still other restrictions are not present in this section (e.g. "an ECMAScript implementation must not provide any means to observe a key of...

> As @allenwb [says](https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/1323#issuecomment-428659297): > > > The current "forbidden extensions" were all carefully selected to address very specific concerns. > > So 17.1 doesn't summarize specific kinds of restrictions....

Right, I got tripped up by the definition of "extension" again. Maybe that's what's missing from the compliance model.

Thanks for starting this discussion, @howard-e. My comment is an outlier among the three that you've referenced in that I was looking for guidance on the *reduction* of line length....

[The community group discussed this issue briefly during today's meeting.](https://www.w3.org/2024/04/24-aria-at-minutes.html#t04)

Thanks, @mcking65!

Thanks for taking the time to summarize here, @gnarf. I lost some context over the months since we built the first iteration, so the refresher has been helpful. ##### Automatic...

> The "error" status from the job with a "cancelled" test could be rendered as "cancelled due to error" on the frontend as opposed to just "cancelled" (by human hand)...