James Sumners

@ldez @dmke what are the chances of this getting into a release?

> I'll have a look later this week, when I have an hour or two of quiet time. Thank you. > In the meantime I'd appreciate if you could remove...

@dmke have you had an opportunity to look at this?

@ldez @dmke is there anything I can do to help make progress toward a decision on this PR?

Please give this PR some attention @ldez and @dmke.

@dmke I'll try re-running the tests on my Windows system again. I can't see what the issue is in the CI output because there is just way too much of...

> Hey all! Is there any traction on this? I'd love to see this functionality, since I can't do ipv6 directly from my udmpro. I keep the branch updated. But...

> Even if I didn't provide feedback for now, this PR is still on my backlog. > > Currently, I'm not satisfied with the implementation, so I need to take...

That's a nonsense approach. We have zero control over what ISPs do. We have 100% control over the software we write.

This sounds very much like issue #940. We have an integration test that covers it https://github.com/ldapjs/node-ldapjs/blob/bec2ff8e7399155ebdcbf86eec2077a792b8510b/test-integration/client/issue-940.test.js Can you point out where the integration test is different from what you are...