Jens Steube

Thanks for the report. The current release cycle has been extended while major changes are being staged.

Same as https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/pull/3724 there's a larger patch coming in and the changes in types.h complicate things too much. We'll maybe merge this afterwards, I've not yet decided.

This is interesting, but did you try it also on all the different compute runtimes like cuda, nvidia opencl, amd opencl, rocm, pocl, intel cpu opencl, intel gpu opencl, etc?

This is a very dangerous operation. If the numbers are not correct, it can cause hashcat to do out-of-boundary reads, which can crash hashcat with all sorts of weird errors....

As I said, this is very complicated. Especially for the maintenance in future. That combination of maintenance and complicated logic is the worst situation you can end up. We can't...

I probably would have solved the issue differently. But the implementation as it is now is good and it looks like you spent some time implementing it. I'll merge the...

I've talked to some AMD developers. They dropped HIPRTC from Windows without giving an exact reason. If you want to use HIP (what I recommend), then you need to use...

I think we can implement some more generic approach. For instance, instead of using: `md5(md5(md5(password) + ” + ‘_bt.cn’) + salt)`, we can do something like: `md5(md5(md5(password) + ” +...

The new plugin is finished and pushed with commits https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/commit/19e20c7d09c45d85565db7aa39e27976204ddb40 and https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/commit/949377686ecab9eaaa297f1880d24e86429d1846 to master branch. I've also update hashcat.net/beta Please close the issue if everything works as it should.

Note I've renumber from from 31500 to 31700: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/commit/dc51a1a976e87d18532fd0437a74db1acc85ada3