Johannes Meixner
Johannes Meixner
@pcahyna my personal feeling is that currently we are too near the ReaR 2.8 release so that I feel rather uncomfortable with changing what "make dist OFFICIAL=1" does ONLY because...
@pcahyna I agree that having a gzipped archive in our source tree is bad but I don't agree to get rid of that functionality where a user could add a...
Regarding usr/share/rear/skel/Debian/default.tar.gz ``` # tar -tzvf usr/share/rear/skel/Debian/default.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- root/root 1059 2007-10-05 16:06 lib/linux-sound-base/noOSS.modprobe.conf ``` It doesn't look as if this single file could not be a regular file in skel?...
From my current (Wednesday evening) point of view I would prefer to "don't deal with it for 2.8" and deal with it properly for ReaR 3.0. I assume an appropriate...
@schlomo does your https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/3368#issuecomment-2551800730 mean the current usr/share/rear/skel/Debian/default.tar.gz content lib/linux-sound-base/noOSS.modprobe.conf is only a test and that noOSS.modprobe.conf is not actually needed in the ReaR recovery system for Debian?
@castilma did you get some ``` "No 'hash' value for LUKS.. volume ..." ``` message on your terminal? If at all you would have got such a message only if...
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rear/rear/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
@castilma because of your https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/3361 I assume you use Artix Linux also here. The whole booting setup of the ReaR recovery system has become a mess of various pieces and...
With https://github.com/rear/rear/commit/d5b48f30e299049c9e6d5df1d1a19b74b3b8bdcf I improved the USB_BOOTLOADER description in default.conf to make it clear that for UEFI with GRUB2 also USING_UEFI_BOOTLOADER must be set appropriately, see https://github.com/rear/rear/pull/3364
@thomas-merz only an offhanded blind shot into the dark: Does perhaps the general info on https://documentation.suse.com/sle-ha/15-SP6/html/SLE-HA-all/cha-ha-rear.html#ex-ha-rear-config-UEFI help in your particular case? Does it perhaps only fail with ISO EFI-booting on...