Johannes Meixner

Tested SLES 12 SP 5 with default btrfs structure (with and without BACKUP_PROG_INCLUDE), see https://github.com/rear/rear/wiki/Test-Matrix-ReaR-2.8#sles-12-sp-5-with-default-btrfs-structure

No open issues with milestone "ReaR 2.8" except this one and no open pull requests with milestone "ReaR 2.8" plus added latest git commit messages to "Details" in https://github.com/rear/rear.github.com/blob/master/documentation/release-notes-2-8.md So...

The ReaR 2.8 release notes on our web page looked bad because in the "Details" section all git commit messages were shown as one single code block so it was...

@rear/contributors please have a look at my current rear-release-notes.txt for ReaR 2.8 in https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/3238#issuecomment-2531502357 and if you agree with its content I would replace our current one for ReaR 2.7...

[rear-release-notes.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18079348/rear-release-notes.txt)

I cleaned up my rear/rear "jsmeix" branches https://github.com/rear/rear/branches i.e. I removed all old/outdated/obsoleted "jsmeix" branches but I kept which belong to my current "draft" pull requests which I like to...

@schlomo @gdha @pcahyna I would like that you do a thorough proofread of all the 'git' related things in https://github.com/rear/rear/wiki/Release-process and where needed clarify and enhance it so that the...

My current plan what I will do for the ReaR 2.8 release: I will basically follow what is described in the section "Preparation" in https://github.com/rear/rear/wiki/Release-process#preparation but I would perfer to...

My results for "Test packaging (RPM, DEB, …​)" on my homeoffice workstation: Only RPM: In a local clone of our current GitHub master code (i.e. without updated version in usr/sbin/rear...

My results for "Test packaging (RPM, DEB, …​)" on my homeoffice workstation: Only DEB: In a local clone of our current GitHub master code (i.e. without updated version in usr/sbin/rear...