Ján Sáreník

@ajtowns and yes, the current faucet's balance is `6273.38730076`, but was around 2500 few months ago. I am feeding it from fauCAT (one machine here running Signet in Inquisition).

Thanks for pointers! I have missed @kallewoof 's idea of batching that would silently ignore repeated requests from the same address. Let me think… 

First, let me say I thought about batching some time ago but without the addition of silently ignoring retries from the same IP, which I like a lot, but still...

Thank you for the inspiration in faucet-waltz. Yes, much higher fees than needed are currently being paid by the alt signet faucet. It is intentional and as far as I...

And as for triggering lots of transactions and block space I am actually happy someone other than me started to do such activity. I used to do such mempool-filling experiments...

Yes. Working on it. Moving in that direction but also considering repetitive RBF of that big batched faucet payout. Huge amount of spam was eliminated already and my high faucet-tx...

> The lots of blockspace usage seems to be the fiamma bitvm bridge testnet launch. Yes. https://github.com/jsarenik/bitcoin-faucet-shell/discussions/7#discussion-7700448

This is done already: - `GET.sh` uses referrer - see [older comment](https://github.com/jsarenik/bitcoin-faucet-shell/issues/4#issuecomment-2354759358) for context - `alt.signetfaucet.com` [works again](https://github.com/jsarenik/bitcoin-faucet-shell/discussions/8) - Schmaltz (rhymes with Waltz) development is being done [separated](https://signet25.bublina.eu.org/schmaltz.html) without breaking...

Turnstile is in use already Now I''ll think about simple RBF script that takes an in-mempool txid and makes an unsigned raw hex replacement ready to be signed and sent....

@lilin998 Read at https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Signet