J. S. Choi
J. S. Choi
Since December, TC39 has continued to discuss the pipe operator in the greater context of “dataflow”. Because this discussion is so crucial to the prospects of the pipe operator (as...
At the 2022-03 [plenary meeting](https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/main/2022/03.md), the [Committee mildly preferred `@` as the topic reference](https://github.com/tc39/notes/blob/main/meetings/2022-03/mar-29.md#bikeshedding-the-pipe-operator-topic-token). ~~A pull request for changing the specification to use `@` has been made: #268.~~ In related...
## 2022-04 Due to concerns raised by a TC39 delegate (https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator/issues/91#issuecomment-1084946624), `@` has been excluded as a topic reference. We’re looking again at `^^`, `@@`, `%%`, `#_`, etc. ## 2022-07...
CC: @JLHwung, @pokute.
Due to the serious parsing concerns raised by @waldemarhorwat in https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator/issues/91#issuecomment-1084946624, I’m withdrawing this pull request.
I am personally pro-*eventually*-adding-a-split-mix tacit-unary-function-call `|>>`. I agree with @rbuckton (https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator/issues/91#issuecomment-917645179) that `|>>` is a reasonable goal. > JS wouldn't be the first language with multiple pipe-like operators. However, @tabatkins...
> good to hear! It'd be great to know what you think the right timing would be. > Does that mean the adoption of Hack-style would decrease the chance of...
> I through this is probably better handled by do expression proposal instead. See also tc39/proposal-hack-pipes#4 (which led to me rewording some stuff in the explainer a few months ago).
@mmkal: Yeah, those concerns about siloing the JavaScript tacit-programming community are understandable. I’m sorry for all the frustration that people who like tacit programming have had—feeling like something was promised...
Thanks, @sffc! (To make it clear, when I presented proposal-function-pipe-flow, I did not intend for it to be a potential supplanter of the pipe operator, but rather as an adjunct...