Jean-Robin

@imkrishnasarathi, is there any news about our comments on this PR? Please let us know if you plan to keep working on it or if we should close the PR....

Waiting for discussion to be closed in issue https://github.com/Avaiga/taipy/issues/2306 before merging it into develop.

We would like to make the summary generic on tables as well. We have to detail the requirements. Thank you for your great feedback.

Sorry @tri0n0, but this issue is not open to an external contribution as it requires some privileges to update some private assets and run some tests. Thank you for your...

> * [Pandas](https://pypi.org/project/pandas/) 1.3.5? Do you mean [1.5.3](https://pypi.org/project/pandas/1.5.3/#files)? Is it realistic that that old artifact will be available for Python 3.13? 🤔 Hi @awhitford , Thank you for your message....

> If we are blocked on this issue, we should change the doc to say we are not compatible with 3.13 [@joaoandre-avaiga](https://github.com/joaoandre-avaiga) [@jrobinAV](https://github.com/jrobinAV) You are right. Here are two PRs...

Branch in progress: https://github.com/Avaiga/taipy/tree/feature/%232071-rank-datanodes-in-selector Corresponding PR: https://github.com/Avaiga/taipy/pull/2072 @FredLL-Avaiga Does it make sense for you to take over this issue and the related branch?

So please create a PR to merge into my branch instead of develop then. Thx.

I understand we want to rank the data node for a given scenario, which is not necessarily the owner of the data node. The given scenario could be: - the...

Alternative: We rename it and we remove the documentation. TODO @jrobinAV Change the description before moving the issue into the product backlog.