Julien Ponge
Julien Ponge
Thanks @doppelrittberger, but I'm still puzzled, because this will run the subscription on a worker thread, but I guess the `onNext` signals can be from an event-loop thread, WDYT?
Not a review: I would use `refactor!: xyz` as a commit message, because it's a refactoring with breaking changes.
@ozangunalp @cescoffier I've asked for review, but note that there is no rush for this PR. We should eventually consider it for Mutiny 3 I think due to the presence...
We don't have roadmap yet, but we'll sort it by mid-June I think. Meanwhile you can always apply the patch on your own build of Mutiny (not ideal I know,...
Note: when this gets merged, think of closing https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/issues/45469
Note: do not merge yet.
Plans for Mutiny 3.0.0 announced here: https://github.com/smallrye/smallrye-mutiny/discussions/1950
I'm afraid we don't have any helper for deep pipelines, which is what's been built with: ```java for ( int i = 0; i < loop; i++ ) { final...
Also see https://github.com/reactor/reactor-core/issues/3212, our friends at Reactor have the same kind of problems, and I pretty much agree with their conclusions.
I'd be more than happy to have a look @gavinking, what's the pointer?