Julius Pfrommer

Not at this time. But it is actively worked on by the company Basyskom. Give it a few months.

Looks good from a first look. - Please prefix public methods with UA_Client - Add a unit test so we can protect against future regressions

This hasn't moved for the past 4 weeks. Please give me a hint whether you can actively work on this now for the 1.3 release. Otherwise let's target the master...

Reproduced and solved via #5396. Please validate and close. The solution involves a quite heavy refactoring of the A&C code. For 1.3 and prior, disable multithreading (locking) and this goes...

Please make sure to set `UA_MULTITHREADING` to a value bigger than 100. Otherwise you can run into race conditions when the parallel thread writes into the information model.

> UA_Variant_init UA_NODEID_STRING UA_Client_readValueAttribute UA_Variant_hasScalarType UA_Variant_clear Right. So you use a language that has an FFI to call C functions. But you cannot use static inline function definitions. You raise...

The question is for which compilation unit the object code (machine code) is generated. In C, every .c file is a compilation unit that leads to a .o object file....

That‘s a tough issue. On one hand it would be great to enable language bindings/generation. On the other hand inline functions are great. Better type checking than with macros and...

Yeah, exactly! Taking your proposal a bit further: ```c #define UA_INLINE(decl, impl) #if defined(UA_INLINE_EXPORT) and defined(UA_INLINE_IMPL) decl impl #elif defined(UA_INLINE_EXPORT) UA_EXPORT decl ; #else static inline decl impl #endif ```...

Thanks!