jozzsi

This issue needs to be fixed for https://github.com/redhat-plumbers/dracut-fedora/pull/29 to pass CC @pvalena

Fixed by https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/pull/1655 for Arch, Debian and Fedora. Closing.

CC @pvalena @Nowa-Ammerlaan @Conan-Kudo

Fedora (the only distro I am aware) heavily patches 51-dracut-rescue.install. See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dracut/blob/rawhide/f/0002-revert-fix-install.d-correctly-install-pre-genned-im.patch Would be good to get feedback not just from Fedora on this one (or remove the downstream patch...

Would this solution delete the old rescue image even if `$dracut_rescue_image != "yes"` ? Shouldn't we make sure that rescue image generation succeeded (e.g in a staging area), before removing...

I just noticed that kernel-install supports `remove` command. Is it really expected to remove kernel as part of the `add` command and not as part of the `remove` command ?...

> support for installing (and removing) rescue initramfs entries I understand the concept of a rescue image (really rescue initramfs) existed for a long time (over a decade), but perhaps...

Temporarily closing this PR to reduce the review queue size. Will reopen when the number of open PRs has decreased.

> @jozzsi As part of this work, it would be help to document the difference in scope between `systemd` and `dracut-systemd` and non-`systemd` dracut modules. Added a comment to `systemd`...

@GentooFan2024 can you please also post the output when you generate both a working (v103) and a failing (v106) initramfs. I am curious if `crypt` dracut module is included in...