Jochen Topf
Jochen Topf
> It seems there were good reasons to introduce it for the XML format back in the days. I don't think too much thought went into that decision at that...
Please don't mix unrelated changes in a single PR. In this case the code changes with unrelated whitespace or wording changes. This makes is very hard to review the change...
We don't have any (structured) way of "saying" in project files how tags are interpreted specifically. We don't say: "Can only contain numbers", or "numbers with units m/ft" are unterstood....
> But it would still seem to be a different dimension than multi-valued or not Isn't that just an array type?
Sorry, I'll take a look when I'll have the time. Pushing is not going to make this any faster.
This regression was introduced in 4ce5fb68beffc148cba277a92b1b4ceb5b20d889.
Thanks. Sorry this took me so long.
Protozero has been around since before CMake introduced that capability/syntax and is used by software using the "old" approach that we currently have. I'd be all for changing that but...
@kkaefer I am not worried about old CMake versions, I am worried about old *users* of protozero who use the old way of things in their CMake configs.
Debian Bullseye is still supported and probably used by some and it has CMake 3.18.4., Ubuntu 22.04 has CMake 3.22.1. I think we don't need go farther back then these,...