Jochen Topf
Jochen Topf
> So the type=boundary roles should be accepted as a valid type=multipolygon roles I think we should probably re-tag those as type=boundary.
Interesting case. Never thought about this. First, case A. I see two possible interpretations of this: 1. The `?` area isn't part of any of the (multi)polygons here. 2. The...
This just looks like over-detailed mapping to me. Can you give a rule (that can be automated) that would describe (at least some of) those cases?
Both relations you mention look reasonable to me. In fact I would argue that splitting them up more could make sense. (Less to download if only working on a part...
I have started to create challenges for the about 50,000 cases where one or more ways have the same tags as the multipolygon relation.
@imagico OSMF servers are in the process of being changed to carto 4 which uses the new interpretation. As I write this 3 of the 4 OSMF tile servers have...
Did you check whether the MD5 matches (see `planet-210524.osm.bz2.md5`)?
Looks to me like you (@gartenkralle) might have a problem with your hardware, faulty memory or so. I suggest running a memory tester.
Same problem in a few other places. Also in `create_valid_single_layer_v2_linestring` for instance.
@springmeyer There is no "design" in the endianness handling of protozero. I checked what boost was doing and then built the simplest thing that made everything work on the test...