Joseph Wright
Joseph Wright
Looking back here: don't we simply need to add tab to `\dospecials`?
@muzimuzhi Thanks - I think that confirms that this simply needs doing in `\dospecials` - one for the June 2025 LaTeX2e release.
Fixed at the 2e end
The aim of having the `-code` file here was to look at having a cleaner split for docs: one for the API, one for the implementation. Most of the time...
Well it is to some extent this was intended as an experiment in how best to document the code - there is work to do in developing best practice. So...
There seems to be a consensus so I will make a change: as I said, one reason for the difference here was to allow exploration of what works for people.
> A further request: except when this is not feasible, please provide .pdf versions of _all_ .dtx, etc., files (including those that are "under development"). Not sure what you mean...
I wonder how we want to name the outputs here (and more widely). For `l3kernel`, we have `interface3` and `source3`, so an API doc and an API + code doc...
[Aside: for a document-level package like `siunitx`, `XXX` is the user docs, so `XXX-api` and `XXX-code`?]
On `l3draw`, there's quite a bit of setup in the 'user' `.dtx`: how do we want to make this available to the `-code` file? Split it out, copy-paste, something else?