Joseph Wright

Looks to me like this is fixed from the TeX4ht end, so I will close here.

I spot this is #208.

I've given this some more thought now and I feel that it is possible out-of-scope for `\numrange`/`\qtyrange` as it really _only_ applies to orders of magnitude. That suggests a dedicated...

I've decided to re-open #229 as it's specifically-focussed on one aspect and I can put that down for a clear milestone. I can then look again at wider questions later:...

For v3 I dropped the pre-unit as it really wasn't a good idea. As such, I'm closing here.

This is simply how TeX works: argument numbers have to be known/correct to get the right outputs in an efficient way.

I'm afraid we can't use `\expanded`, as it's not part of the e-TeX extensions - `etoolbox` has never gone beyond those. Perhaps we can find a way to do things...

> 1. Soft-deprecate `\cs_parameter_spec:N` and `\cs_replacement_spec:N`; that is, recommend against its use, but still keep it around for a bit. (I counted 52 files in `$TEXMFDIST` that use them, so...

> > [...N]othing will be removed from `l3kernel` in future [–] we have reached the point where that doesn't make sense. > > That seems for the best. However, @gucci-on-fleek...

@Witiko I think we should see what @FrankMittelbach, @car222222, @eg9, etc., think