hydromad
hydromad copied to clipboard
Simhyd documentation
All Submissions:
- [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our CONTRIBUTING document?
- [x] Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
Closes #37
Types of changes
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue. List the bug ID if applicable)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing core functionality to change)
This completes the documentation for simhyd. However, I have split the simhyd.R code to have a separate simhydrouting.R as this was cleaner and follows the "sma" and "routing" convention better. I hope this does not break any other features. The documentation for the routing and simhyd is similar except for the parameters.
It is still giving me the testthat error, even though I am even with the master from Joseph == testthat results ======================================== [ OK: 256 | SKIPPED: 3 | WARNINGS: 22 | FAILED: 1 ]
- Failure: formula works within functions (@test-statistics.R#82)
Codecov Report
Merging #182 (a289bff) into master (33bb1ec) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
0.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #182 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 66.64% 66.64%
=======================================
Files 109 110 +1
Lines 6736 6736
=======================================
Hits 4489 4489
Misses 2247 2247
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
R/simhyd.R | 98.46% <ø> (+28.13%) |
:arrow_up: |
R/simhydrouting.R | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 33bb1ec...a289bff. Read the comment docs.
As discussed, Willem, could you see if you want to change the example for simhyd? Maybe using Murrindindi?
@WillemVervoort - sorry it's taken me so long to get back to this. Are you happy to see if simhyd performs better on the built-in Murrindindi dataset rather than the Cotter?