Seph Gentle

@ept Thanks for the feedback - that makes a lot of sense and I agree. I'll add a timestamp field to transaction objects in the spec, and a dummy timestamp...

Maybe - this looks like the kind of thing that will get bundled for the web even if it’s not used, and end up pulling in a node stream polyfill...

🤷‍♀️ I’m not too fussed either way. I think about it like Express - there’s a complicated library that exports a single function, because that function is the core thing...

That'd be good... sizes are interesting there - do you want a specific number of bytes? Of characters (with a byte limit)? Anyway, its a good idea. Feel free to...

I must have missed this while I was travelling. (I only just got back a few days ago). Sorry about that! My impression from reading your blog post is that...

At this point all my development has moved to rust. I've [rewritten this library in rust](https://github.com/josephg/jumprope-rs) and gotten a pretty big performance gain in the process. I'm actually not sure...

Interesting idea. Could be worthwhile but not super relevant for my use case. You wanna throw something together? I’d love to see how it performs.

Works fine for me. What version of foundationdb do you have installed? (Find out with `fdbcli --version`) ``` $ fdbcli --version FoundationDB CLI 6.2 (v6.2.28) ```

Reproduced this issue on fdb 6.2.15.

Yeah, I'm not sure what the right approach is here. I've reached out to the [foundationdb developers forum](https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/foundationdb-fdb-api-version-version-from-bindings/2867) about it to see if anyone has a recommendation about how to...