Joseph Bisch

I tried parsing the blk0001.dat file in Python to get a better understanding of the format and I made a breakthrough. Since blocks >= 19200 may or may not be...

I (think) I got the all the blocks loaded without errors for the Namecoin testnet (I haven't tried with mainnet yet). Now I need some testnet namecoins to verify that...

Wow, someone sent me 50 testnet namecoins! (Yes I know they are worthless, still surprised at the number) The balance does show up. I need to do some more testing,...

Thanks, I was able to send successfully too.

I pushed my latest changes to [my fork of Armory](https://github.com/josephbisch/BitcoinArmory/tree/namecoin). It can't be tested right now because the dev branch which I based the namecoin branch off of is broken....

The dev branch is working again and I pushed my changes again, so you can test it now if you want. I'm not done with the fee calculation logic yet....

I tried setting the same rules for calculating fees in `calcMinSuggestedFeesNew` as I did in `calcMinSuggestedFees`, but Armory is allowing me to attempt to send a single satoshi with no...

I pushed some code for the fee calculations. In my tests, transactions less than 0.01NMC calculates a 0.005NMC fee and anything greater than or equal to 0.01NMC calculates no fee....

I don't think that commit matters for Armory. That looks like just the default fee that the Namecoin-qt client uses and that can be changed in the settings. What does...

And it looks to me like I need to get above 3K, because the block itself is 1K. [See this line](https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin/blob/namecoinq/src/main.cpp#L3424). Unless I am looking in the wrong place.