Joey Arhar

@keithamus yes that would be great! then i can link to the bug in the OP

@foolip @domenic could I get a review of this? The corresponding HTML PR has been merged and I filled out the OP

My draft spec has a proposed updated content model here: https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10548 The gist of the changes: `` - Either one of the following: - Zero or more ``s, ``s, ``s,...

Thanks for the discussion! So it sounds like I should keep the content model the way it is but also remove the requirement of having alt='' or aria-hidden=true, and then...

> Should alt text be included in the submitted value? That would be a normative change, but maybe it's not a web compat problem (since you can't easily use images...

> It seems cumbersome if you would otherwise not have to do that > that pure text version should be roughly the same as what AT sees I think and...

Thanks scott!! I created a spec PR here: https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10586

Some [feedback](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10857#issuecomment-2361423540) from @fantasai - Only `` should be allowed instead of `` outside of `` because the elements wrapping `` should be block level - Elements like `` and...

Here is an updated overview of the new content model (to replace https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10317#issuecomment-2286699243): Within `` these nodes are allowed: * ``, ``, and `` * `` * `` and script-supporting...

> understand the feedback about no span outside of options - but not sure why it wouldn't be allowed within options? Or is that a miss that it's not listed...