Josemar Luedke
                                            Josemar Luedke
                                        
                                    Is there any intension in moving TypeScript types here further?
Is there any intension in moving TypeScript types here further?
I agree with the mixed programing model is bad. We have been using TS and our apps and devs often get mad about the mix of `.extend` to add ember-concurrency...
@balinterdi The addon is actually not tested against Embroider. We need to add these to the GitHub Actions list: https://github.com/ember-graphql/ember-apollo-client/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L40-L47
This is interesting. Assuming you are doing the prefer native option, I think you would need to overwrite the default link options to pass a different fetch. It would look...
@viniciussbs Yes, I'm helping maintain this project. Are you still having this issue? If so, could you create a pull request with a failing test? Or create a reproduction repo....
I'm trying to get a reproduction of this issue and unfortunately, I'm not able to do so. I have created a test for the refetch case and it works fine...
Yes, it is possible to incrementally migrate the project to TypeScript. If you are open for it, I will start doing some work on that.
Adding type definitions seem to be a good alternative, however, it would be best if the project was written in TypeScript itself. This is the goal with my latest PRs...