Gamma aware ? resize algo ?

[Kuranes]

As many browser doesn't do gamma-aware resize, you might want to do a gamma aware resize by yourself (a matter of converting pixels using a pow(gamma) before & the contrary after resize.

http://filmicgames.com/archives/354 http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma.html

Why not multiple resize algorithms, nearest, cubic, etc...

http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/07/better-image-resizing.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_scaling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanczos_resampling or even hqx (in case of pixel art)

[josefrichter]

Thanks for that. This was just a proof of concept, but surely implementing better scaling algorithm might be needed sometimes. Thanks for the links, very useful!

p.s. feel free to fork me, add the algorithms, and send the pull request :-)

[josefrichter]

btw. I tried Lanczos on this branch https://github.com/josefrichter/resize/tree/lanczos but the results are horrible (chrome on mac)

[Kuranes]

Indeed chrome does have better/clever filters ( read some code there for ideas http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/skia/ext/convolver.cc http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/skia/ext/image_operations.cc )

But that's not the case with firefox for example, your Lanczos filter is better. Browser dependant code needed...

Now the problem is that all have the incorrect gamma problem... try 0.5 scale with that image http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/gamma-1.0-or-2.2.png (from eric brasseur link above)

Here's some basic code you can add to the new branch:

var gamma        = 2.2;
var gamma_invert = 1 / gamma;

function imgOrCanvasToLinear(img)
{
    var inputImg, inputCtx, scaledCanvas;
    if (!(img instanceof HTMLCanvasElement)){
        inputImg = document.createElement('canvas');
        inputImg.width = img.width;
        inputImg.height = img.height;
        inputCtx = inputImg.getContext('2d');
        inputCtx.drawImage( img, 0, 0, img.width, img.height, 0, 0, img.width, img.height);
    }
    else{
        inputCtx = inputImg.getContext('2d');
        inputImg = img;
    }
    var inPixels = inputCtx.getImageData(0, 0, inputImg.width, inputImg.height).data;
    // convert it to linear         
    var len = img.height*img.width*4;
    var linearInPixel = {};//new Float32Array(len),
    var gamma        = 2.2

    for (var pix = 0; pix < len; pix++)
    {
        linearInPixel[pix] = Math.pow(inPixels[pix], gamma);
    }
    return { data: linearInPixel, width: img.width, height: img.height, length : len};      
}

function linearToImgCanvas(imgOutPut)
{
    outputCanvas = document.createElement('canvas');
    outputCanvas.width = imgOutPut.width;
    outputCanvas.height = imgOutPut.height;
    var outputCtx = outputCanvas.getContext('2d');
    var outputPixels = outputCtx.getImageData( 0, 0, imgOutPut.width, imgOutPut.height );
    var outputPixelsData = outputPixels.data;

    for( var pix = 0; pix < imgOutPut.length; pix++ ) 
    {
        outputPixels.data[pix] = Math.pow(imgOutPut.data[pix], gamma_invert);
    }
    outputCtx.putImageData( outputPixels, 0, 0 );

    return outputCanvas;
}

Apply "imgOrCanvasToLinear" before the filter (beginning of "thumbnailer") And "linearToImgCanvas" at the end and get a canvas element with the correct gamma. ("process2") It should work because your filter code doesn't do clamping to 0,255 or store to uint8 (the settimeout call are strange and slowing down the code... without any real use. why not remove them? )

[josefrichter]

Thanks! I added the functions (see updated code) but don't fully understand how to use them. What to pass them and what I am getting back. Therefore not sure where and how exactly to use them. Can you help me with this, please? I tried to put them in based on your instructions, but always getting various errors. Thanks.

[josefrichter]

thanks for pull reuqest. still getting 'linearImg is not defined' on line 142 though.

[Kuranes]

s/linearImg/img/ s/max_width/sx/

[Kuranes]

well, let me 5mn, time to test the code locally...

[josefrichter]

ok, thanks

[Kuranes]

sorry for the mess, should have known that pure code never work out of the box, always typos hiding everywhere..., the latest should be the one.