Jordan Brown

I have mixed feelings about whether `concat()` should ever be valid for objects. If it could completely replace `object()` then I'd say yes, but it can't (at least not well)...

Note for the future: it makes it a lot easier for people looking at your problem if you can reduce it to the simplest program that demonstrates the problem, rather...

Yeah, like I said, the previewer cheats. It stacks up triangles with *exactly* the right modes in *exactly* the right order to simulate boolean operations. It can do that very...

Nophead makes a good point: I said that the problem was when the camera was *inside* the model. That's not quite right. It's when the camera is too close to...

Note that the last commit on this PR was in 2019. Most of this discussion has been surrounding my proposal [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/14siqbr9CyGuA2tY6dvTqiF3Hf9zFMyefk7YdaUJSn3Q)) which tries to bring together "object literals" (#3087) with...

I agree with Nophead that the terminology is confusing. We have two distinct kinds of objects - geometric objects, and this relatively new-to-OpenSCAD name-value-pair mechanism that is akin to what...

The syntax part of my proposal is the easy part. It adds a new entry to "primary": ``` | '{' inner_input '}' ``` Doing little more than that made it...

It seems that this discussion is plagued by terminological problems. Let me suggest a glossary and some basic definitions. [n] marks footnotes. [X] marks features present in today's development snapshots....

Added: * geometry reference - a data item that refers to a geometric object.[X][5] * geometry literal - a syntactic structure that embeds a geometric object in an expression context,...

@nseinlet That's exactly the point of this project and issue #391 .