Joohwan Oh

Hi @bloodbare, Wow this is amazing! I'll make sure to mention your project in python-arango readme. You should also send an email to ArangoDB team so they can have your...

I'm open to merging into python-arango, but it will nearly double the codebase (and double the effort to maintain). I'm not sure how much code reuse there could be between...

@joakimnordling `unasync.py` looks interesting but feels a little hacky. I'm leaning towards @davidschrooten's suggestion a little more currently (which will allow us to take advantage of @mirrorrim and @bloodbare's work...

Hi @Darkheir, thanks for the PR. Could you please address the failing test? Thanks.

Hi @Darkheir, I'm not in favor of introducing the dummy async job class. It seems too "hacky" for a small performance gain, and breaks the users' expectation of error codes...

That's a good point. You can leave this PR as is for now, and I'll think about it a bit more (maybe we'll merge this after all).

Any update on this issue?

Hey @aqc-eligny, Could you try again with `db = client.db(..., verify=False)` and let me know if that makes a difference (I believe it should)?

LGTM

Sorry for the delay @pvicente. Merged and will make a release soon.