[5.2] Integer custom field to be numerical input instead of a drop-down

[sakiss]

Pull Request for Issue #42579

Summary of Changes

So far the Integer custom field is a drop-down list. Though it is crashing the browser when the list becomes too long. Moreover it is really hard to use, after a certain length.

With the PR the Integer custom field is an input of type number. Though, it still follows the min, max and step settings, that existed.

Testing Instructions

Try setting up a custom field of type "Integer" for an article. Within the article you will see an input, instead of a drop-down,

Actual result BEFORE applying this Pull Request

Drop-down list.

Expected result AFTER applying this Pull Request

Input of type number

Link to documentations

DKN

[Fedik]

Thanks for the PR. Before you continue. We should not change existing integer field. And instead of it, need to create a new Number custom field, which will use NumberField class.

[crommie]

I have tested this item :white_check_mark: successfully on a8e9be46db8386b29c3bdc4e55f41b891d8ed3e3

This does what it says. But Fedik's suggestion below sounds logical to me.

---

_{This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/43697.}

[pe7er]

I have tested this item :white_check_mark: successfully on a8e9be46db8386b29c3bdc4e55f41b891d8ed3e3

Works like described.

---

_{This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/43697.}

[brianteeman]

This breaks backwards compatibility and should be a new field

[richard67]

Not setting RTC due to reason stated in previous comment. The "Updates requested" label is already set.

[HLeithner]

This pull request has been automatically rebased to 5.3-dev.

[ghost]

@sakiss Can you please do the requested updates?

[komalm]

I have tested this item :white_check_mark: successfully on a8e9be46db8386b29c3bdc4e55f41b891d8ed3e3

---

_{This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/tracker/joomla-cms/43697.}

[HLeithner]

This pull request has been automatically rebased to 6.0-dev.

[sakiss]

Closed for reasons mentioned