Jon Calder

Thanks @seankross! Makes sense and I had wondered if that (testing for breaking changes) may be the issue.

Thanks for the feedback! This is an interesting point that you raise and so I get where you are coming from. I'm not entirely sure I agree with the conclusion...

Sorry for not weighing in on this again sooner, I did re-read the thread a while back but since it looked like the conversation was progressing I didn't feel the...

#110 is not directly related to this. I think @xarxziux was just testing out his Node script which picked up a missing test case for the `acronyms` exercise. That made...

I''ll do my best to prioritise stuff for #48in24 I've started working on adding (the beginnings of) approaches for leap so will open a PR for that.

Yes I've been following the relevant forum posts the past few days (but thanks for mentioning them anyway). I'm basing the R approaches for leap on the python ones (and...

Happy for you to open PR's for practice exercises if and when you work on them. One thing I would note though, is that for the more complex exercises there...

Ok cool - but it's not so much the `example.R` implementation that I'm referring to (although that is of course impacted by other implementation details). The reason I bring this...

Thanks so much for picking up on this (again) and planning ahead! I think I'm happy to work on approaches for raindrops. Please could you work on adding roman-numerals and...

As I alluded to earlier in this thread, I think that `robot-simulator` calls for an object-oriented implementation using S3. It doesn't have to be done that way but it would...