Jon Ludlam
Jon Ludlam
Slightly smaller test case: ```ocaml type t = int option let rec f ?(optional : t) () = f ?optional () ``` So, this turns out to be quite interesting....
It'd be handy to have someone who knows how the compiler handles this for an opinion - @Octachron, would you be able to take a look and suggest how to...
Hum, I don't have an `Env.t` at this point. This'll require something a bit different I think.
Always nice to see PRs that remove more lines than they add :-)
I can't see clearly from the test what was broken before and now fixed? Is it worth having an explicit test? The sea of json in the existing test case...
The only thing odoc can do here is error more gracefully, but that would be a lot nicer than the horrendous backtrace, so let's do that.
Can you please see if applying PR #1081 helps at all? It looks to me like it's looking up a shadowed value which doesn't work well in master - that...
Good news, thanks for checking!
I'm going to close this for now. When we do a support-files like command for latex we can always come back to take a look at this PR.