Jon Ison

very good - which would trap any currently _unknown_ issues (and soon we'll have fixed all the _known_ ones). ps for the [validation](https://github.com/bio-tools/content/issues/5) angles we already have [biotoolsLint](https://github.com/bio-tools/biotoolsLint) (currently just...

quick update @bgruening and @hmenager : @hansioan and me are making sweeping progress on above, but it's a huge job ... will keep you posted. The (clean) content dump will...

quick update @bgruening @piotrgithub1 me and @hansioan are done with the clean-ups (huge job) only thing left is a final verification of IDs (for things added in last weeks). Once...

**UPDATE** All things mooted on Feb 5 have been done, but keep this open because there will be further improvements to make, no doubt.

We already have a repo for this (https://github.com/bio-tools/bio.tools-content) but the names maybe a bit crappy? How about: * https://github.com/bio-tools/tools * https://github.com/bio-tools/content * https://github.com/bio-tools/resources * https://github.com/bio-tools/entries Preferences? I'll need to spell...

_From @bgruening on December 8, 2018 10:56_ My gut feeling is `https://github.com/bio-tools/tools`. Its bio.__tools__ so `tools` makes a lot of sense :) I would prefere YAML, as this is currently...

OK thanks! Just a note that https://dev.bio.tools/api/tool/ is currently serving a mess (in all of XML, JSON and YAML :) ) - but this has been sorted locally. I plan...

_From @scapella on December 8, 2018 20:22_ IMHO I'd go either for https://github.com/bio-tools/resources or https://github.com/bio-tools/content as there is more content than just tools - Regarding the structure of the repo...

_From @hansioan on December 10, 2018 11:39_ @joncison @hmenager @bgruening Why not all of them? I would prefer it to be JSON of course :) , but perhaps the best...

_From @jlgelpi on December 10, 2018 11:45_ I would go for a single format for the repository (one that can be easily checked against a schema). Having several formats may...