Jon Ison

This issue was moved to edamontology/edamontologyDocs#17

I don't think a thorough inventory of all the work done on EDAM is ever going to happen - so I close this. Added a note to https://github.com/edamontology/edamontologyDocs/issues/17 what could...

Multiple Format concepts had narrow and broad synonyms which is not allowed (see https://edamontologydocs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/developers_guide.html#optional-attributes) - all replaced with exactSynonym. Format specialisations / generalisations should be handled at the conceptual level,...

Is the idea of "give-the-list" to summarise - or give the whole text - of listOfFeaturesOfGreatOSBCs.md ? If "summarise" then I'd suggest providing a link to the md, as some...

I too would prefer the meeting not to be recorded: we can be much more candid in a "private" discussion.

I think this is spot-on. I'd suggest, for ease of comprehension, to bullet the edits under each feature thus: featureName explanation - blah blah benefit - - blah blah tips...

The above looks good from a quick read, I'll just highlight / clarify some key points: 1. Agree biotoolsID should be based on tool name but editable by registrant at...

Oh, and the ID status (and the implications) clearly explained by a label and corresponding pop-up information window in the UI (this used to be there).

### List of issues Use this comment to list (refer to) issues only. Misc. concerns & solutions discussed mostly with @bgruening, @hmenager and @hansioan thus far: * entry ownership /...

hey @ypriverol - here's the (pinned) issue that is simply a list of threads (maintained in comment of 25 Jan) around the integration of tools metadata - currently just from...