Jon Ison

I wonder if an option to hide the upper ontology concepts ("generically dependent continuant" etc) is a general requirement ?

Hi Suvvi Apologies for the late reply - major network outage over the last days here. Many thanks for the suggestions - they will make it into the next release....

I agree with your rule of thumb - which to my mind, none of these concepts quite obey. So for now I added all these as **narrowSynonym** of _Machine learning_...

@hmenager can this be done as part of EDAM CI, perhaps pinging @hansioan (if you want this?) when a release is made ?

@hmenager giving this a nudge - I'd like to release EDAM 1.22 before Paris Biohackathon including file(s) in JSON format (see also https://github.com/edamontology/edamontology/issues/326), because I see hacking opportunities around this...

also perhaps JSON-LD file(s) too ? (see #326 cc @albangaignard)

Hi @hmenager What's the status with EDAM JSON ? It would be nice to bake it into our release process. cc @hansioan

Thanks @bryan-brancotte ! I just accepted all the pull requests (sorry for the tardiness!) Over to you @hmenager :)

There were about a dozen or so concepts with bad subset assignations. And a couple with IDs in the wrong namespace.

No errors detected.