Jonathan Lukas

@pierre-yves-monnet could we catch up on this one? I saw there did happen some things on the process automator as well.

The field is in place, yet we have to define a link per message.

I guess this is something we didn't have a test for (yet).

For now, i would leave this in the hands of a customer.

I would like the multi-instance be a separate activity to be able to distinguish its data from the data that is inside the actual multi-instances: ```json "activities": [ { "reviewInvoices":...

Update: There are container tests in place, but a Junit Test would still be nice

This could be extracted from the converter as it handles all camunda: attributes and elements seperately - basically this could be a generated documentation :P

I would always include REVIEW as well. All expression transformations are flagged with review.

Could be. Let's see how great the interest is.. c7 connectors are not that much in favor

duplicates #97