Johannes Kochems

Thanks, @henhuy, I'll have a look, but currently, I have quite a lot on my plate.

I started digging into this issue: * Unfortunately, it is not so trivial. Thus, for now, I'd recommend to explicitly define the `timeincrement` attribute of an `EnergySystem` when working with...

This is a draft with yet untested functionality, just to get a first impression. I need to add tests as well as to touch the `GenericInvestmentStorageBlock` as well as the...

@nailend and @p-snft: In my view, it is complete and functional. Would you please be so kind to review? Thank you! To check what it does, you may compare lp-files...

> From my understanding, though, a test comparing the actual dispatch results (flows) before and after the fix would make sense. I agree. That would make sense to highlight the...

> Honestly, to me this feature suggests that it was possible to change other parts of the energy system as well. So, you optimise the investment assuming an energy demand,...

> > > Honestly, to me this feature suggests that it was possible to change other parts of the energy system as well. So, you optimise the investment assuming an...

Though the future of this feature is subject to debate, I came across an issue which might be of interest: * I'm solving a really large model instance and have...

> I do see your personal need for this adjustment. However, I fear that this is introducing code dept for a very limited use case. There are several use cases...

I currently do not have the capacities to tackle this Pull Request. Also, I faced numerical issues and infeasibilities when I wanted to test it in a large scale model....