Johannes Kochems

Just to draw your attention to it, there is also some interest from the user community side, see: https://forum.openmod.org/t/oemof-in-combination-with-time-series-aggregation-module-tsam/4157/6

Ouch, that's quite bad, I have to admit. Thanks for pointing this out, @SabineHaas! I haven't come across this issue, yet, as I have been working with brownfield scenarios, mostly....

> I tried to wrap my head around, but I didn't really understand why this constraint doesn't work. But this is a direct consequence of #1030 isn't it? In multi-period,...

Thanks, @p-snft. You are totally right about this. I also thought about pumped storage which will probably come with some filling level initially. @nailend and @SabineHaas: Look what I found:...

Thanks for bringing that up, @SabineHaas. I also noticed that in the course of development, but must have forgotten to open a dedicated issue or it has just not been...

> There are duplicated rule formulations in the investment blocks of [`flows`](https://github.com/oemof/oemof-solph/blob/1cee273d3328fe00daf092f6bdfe9d227573a443/src/oemof/solph/components/_generic_storage.py#L1220), [`_generic_storage`](https://github.com/oemof/oemof-solph/blob/1cee273d3328fe00daf092f6bdfe9d227573a443/src/oemof/solph/components/_generic_storage.py#L1220) and [`SinkDSM`](https://github.com/oemof/oemof-solph/blob/1cee273d3328fe00daf092f6bdfe9d227573a443/src/oemof/solph/components/experimental/_sink_dsm.py#L964C47-L964C47) which only differ slightly with their indexes and constraint name. This counts for: > >...

Well, first of all, you have to say that evaluating the remaining value is an optional thing to do. Second, I think, while in general you are right about your...

Thanks @eldmum. I'll need to have a closer look into that slide and the paper. I tried to keep it simple and linear and my idea was to integrate a...

Just to add: * I seem to have misread / misunderstood the intial post a little. You were mentioning that case of rising costs over time. * I do share...

I agree that I was a bit sloppy here: * For discounting, we need the period years. (In my head, this tends to be more or less the same as...