somex>>

[josuesantos1]

How will this feature work?

[johnmn3]

For the injest.classical namespace, it'll be pretty simple. Just replace ->> with some->>:

(defmacro somex>>
  "Just like some->> but first composes consecutive transducing fns into a function
  that sequences the thread values through the transducers."
  [x & thread]
  `(some->> ~x ~@(->> thread (i/pre-transducify-thread &env 2 `i/xfn i/transducable?))))

For the injest.path namespace, we'll need to add another version of path->> called path-some->> to the injest.impl namespace. It should source inspiration from the some->> macro definition and convert it to the path semantics in the same way that path->> handles the ->> scenario.

PRs welcome!