Johan Haleby

But does spock need to change then if there's nothing we can/should do to awaitility?!

> However, the question is if it's not the primary usage of this artifact. I don't know. Not using Spock myself so never have experienced this problem. One thought, would...

That sounds like a good idea. Not sure how easy it would be to implement though. I think we need a new concept that unifies `atMostTimes` and `atMost`. I.e. a...

That would be great!

There has been some changes internally as part of [PR 45](https://github.com/jayway/awaitility/pull/45). There's now a [WaitConstraint](https://github.com/jayway/awaitility/blob/master/awaitility/src/main/java/com/jayway/awaitility/constraint/WaitConstraint.java) interface that (currently) have two implementations. Perhaps this could be refactored to also support this...

Thanks for the PR and sorry for late response. But if I understand it correctly, I think this is what "aliases" are for already? Or is there a difference between...

@jamesagnew I'm sorry for being such a lazy maintainer lately. I'm almost embarrassed to ask you this, but could try to resolve the conflicts? Then I'll bring it in. I'd...

Now that I come to think of it. Would it make sense to add a higher-order function to alias instead? That way we don't need two different concepts (alias and...

Original comment by `[email protected]` on 27 Jun 2015 at 5:02 - Changed state: **Accepted**

Hi, Doesn't this feature already exists if you use "ignoreException", https://github.com/jayway/awaitility/wiki/Usage#example-9---ignoring-exceptions ?