Johan Bjäreholt

I don't think we should do a PKGBUILD, I'd prefer if we simply fixed so we could install from pip via git (such as "pip install git+git://github.com/activitywatch/aw-server.git#egg=aw-server") and then fix...

@freayd Thanks for submitting the brew formula! Yes, we definitely need a .app bundle, we have pushed on that issue for a bit too long now and really makes the...

A bit of a shame to get even more locked into the GitHub ecosystem, but considering how much of an improvement it seems to be and the time spent it...

> at this point they are the ecosystem Disagree, but that's off topic I guess.

> I think if you work more in your "call to action" in your home page with a highlighted one-line command to install it through package managers like apt and...

@Neurochrom and if the port is a hash of the username, how are watchers such as aw-watcher-web which don't have permissions to know the username be able to know which...

> All could be handled over the same port an every user only sees his own data. Why not implement this solution? Because that's not how ports or processes work....

I think the screenshot is of the Linux build which does not have the same method of fetching the application name. The behavior you have is expected on windows I...

@tivvit Running the server in docker would eat up a lot of RAM and make the installation more complicated, if someone wants to do it themselves that's fine but having...

@alex It is a set of programs (multiple aw-clients reporting to the aw-server) built upon a few shared libraries (aw-client, aw-core). In my opinion it would make the most sense...