Joep Meindertsma

I've got some ideas on using DIDs. Combine both the `publicKey` and the HTTPS `subject` in one JSON object, encode both in a `did:atomic` scheme. We'd end up with one...

@jonassmedegaard I agree that open licenses are important (I spend a lot of time on promoting open data), but I think it's not on the same scale / dimension /...

> Can you give any examples of gaining the 4th star without defining a schema and therefore types for your data? Examples of RDF without a schema? Well, that's pretty...

> ah, so by "types" you don't mean that a FOAF:birthday must be within rdfs:range of rdf-schema#Literal, but instead (or additionally) e.g. some rules that a FOAF:Agent can have only...

> I.e. if you care only about developers (working towards a well-defined product), then SHACL is adequate for you. Just please don't assume it is adequate for all of us...

I've also added a level 0 for proprietary data, and mentioned open licenses @jonassmedegaard what do you think?

🤷 

I don't want to just target developers - but anyone using data. It depends on what you constitute as _using_ data. I think of things like displaying the data, querying...

> Suggestion: Write an addendum to 5-star data, adding a 6th star for strongly typed data. I still think that it's great to adhere to all the stars in the...

> > for me that's far too high in the ladder - it should be at step 3, not step 6 > > Then add a 2½th or 3½th star....