joe petrowski
joe petrowski
I see, so you are looking for either a `pub fn asset_class_exists(id) -> bool;` function within [Inspect](https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/blob/0ba251c/frame/support/src/traits/tokens/fungible.rs#L36), or ```rust impl
> This basically means by becoming a staker, you get a free proxy. How do you plan to handle this on the proxy pallet side? For example, if you add...
Just adding a note here from DM so it doesn't get lost: We could do like Staking and have a "retirement period" (like unbonding period). You'd lose your voting rights...
Yeah, I agree. The Alliance members are meant to be active participants. If someone gets away from a slash because everyone in the Alliance was too lazy to close it,...
There's not a lot of traffic, but it still makes sense to isolate. This also moves logic into an existing parachain and can mostly be done in FRAME, while elections...
By reserving DOT and declaring intent to collate, on a FCFS basis. It's a system we've wanted to update and perfectly fair to open an issue to discuss that, but...
Sure, those are all fair points about parachains in general, but it's really off topic for this issue. I never said that this is higher priority than anything else, like...
> Don't fully understand this, you mean the Treasury says "we want to collect X amount of Y token" and parachains and individuals bid saying "I'll give you the Y...
> It's better if the bond is in the proposal's currency (otherwise an fx rate would be needed to convert from the quantity proposed to the dot equivalent). Yeah but...
In general I think moving to these traits is a good thing. However, there are some runtime features that interact with reserved/slashed assets, e.g. https://github.com/paritytech/cumulus/pull/1433/files, that we're quite far into...