Feature - Support for Java17 record syntax

[maximus321]

It would be nice if the GenerationConfig could support the output as "Record" instead of old school Pojo

public record DataRecord(List<String> types, String test) { }

Thanks for the project!

[unkish]

There are several things that would have to be solved first:

1. migrating code & build pipeline to Java 17, so that tests requiring compilation of generated code would work
2. fork/extend/replace codemodel to support(ing) records

It would have to be noted that there will be limitations due to "nature" of records eg.:

• https://github.com/joelittlejohn/jsonschema2pojo/wiki/Reference#extends
• enum's defined within record
• ...

[KangoV]

This would be an awesome addition! Another solution would be to generate interfaces using immutables.org library.

[akil-rails]

Any plans to support this ?

[joelittlejohn]

Is there a code generator that supports this syntax that anyone knows about? I agree this would be an excellent feature.

[apbleonard1971]

Looking for this also - but already making gains with your project, so thank you :)

[Jaruso]

Java 21 has increased the the applications of records and would make this feature even better