Joe Bayles

@Dbarnes1 agreed, I guess I didn't really make my committee suggestion clear. Schema has to be updated.

@ottenw - After discussing it at the committee, two things: Suggest we only vary the length between points 1 and 2  Army rep will discuss with proponent agency.

This generated quite a bit of conversation. BLUF: This is a draw rule and implementation issue that affects several control measures and tactical mission tasks. The suggestion is that Army...

Esri should review control measures and ensure that the list is complete. Will open another issue for that.

According to the US Army, the only difference from the above graphic is that the angle between the arrows and the base line should be variable, though the length of...

@twornicki will review.

@csmoore thanks for providing the background information (again), like you did here: https://github.com/Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml/issues/119 @abouffard let's talk about this again today.

Dr. Thomas responded with these links: http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/guides/maps/sfcobs/home.rxml http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/guides/maps/sfcobs/wnd.rxml If we are to be in accordance w/ the standard, we should incorporate this into our METOC templates.

@csmoore agree it's a bear, for sure... but I would submit that it already is in the standard, however vague or incomplete it may be. We have already suggested clarification,...

@mepler can you weigh in on this?