Juan Nunez-Iglesias
Juan Nunez-Iglesias
> If you are happy with this let me know and I shall remove the iterative pruning functions from this PR. I think that's a good plan, as it will...
Yep, I'd be fine with this.
@stefanv of course — the idea is to follow the standard deprecation path.
@stefanv you mean keeping the old function names as aliases indefinitely? Seems confusing for newcomers. Maybe a longer deprecation path than usual?
@sciunto thanks for the ping! imho this should remain on our radar. It's just not a high priority because things are working fine...
I think we have not really kept up with creating the necessary public APIs, so I propose that we change the message to 0.6.0 and then make a concerted effort...
Let's just close this? If people want to use projects, they should use them, and if not, they can be ignored?
@Czaki but things like magnitude (thresholds) are usually represented as floats rather than ints, no? In many cases, ints are IDs/categories, and then skipping them makes no sense. (This was...
@stefanv I'd agree with that new home --- do we have any examples that use sklearn in the gallery? I'm guessing we don't want to introduce that dependency?
@sivapvarma Yes, but notice that the examples there don't add any dependencies.