jmjaffe37
jmjaffe37
> My initial testing shows that the default install dir is wrong. See the new installer on the left vs the old installer on the right > > > Doing...
> My initial testing shows that the default install dir is wrong. See the new installer on the left vs the old installer on the right > > > Doing...
Note: to address a request made here: https://github.com/adoptium/installer/issues/888, I implemented a feature to allow vendors to implement custom licenses for hotspot JVMs. It also allows the vendors to choose whether...
Ok, I believe that this PR is ready to be merged now! CC: @gdams, @karianna, @douph1
> Hi @jmjaffe37 great work. I have seen you have made best effort to maintain dual capability of installer to work perUser or perMachine. > > I have added perUser...
Looks like this was implemented as a feature request in https://github.com/adoptium/installer/issues/162 (since agreeing to the GPL2 license is optional for software users)
> I guess we need to provide an override capability. The override capability was already implemented by @douph1. It depends on the JVM: - For Openj9, the `license-OpenJ9.en-us.rtf` license is...
I should be able to add in the capability for the user specify that they want to show the optional GPL license. Would that be preferable?
> I think we need to alter it so it's not vm based but "vm and vendor" based. I know that other non Adoptium vendors also have EULA's (on a...
> I think we need to alter it so it's not vm based but "vm and vendor" based. I know that other non Adoptium vendors also have EULA's (on a...