Jason Dobry

I believe `contains` is an Array operation, and doesn't work on strings. It only works on sequences: https://rethinkdb.com/api/javascript/#contains

Yeah, I'd be interested at looking at your PR.

The problem with `containsArray` is that it's ambiguous on whether it's ORing or ANDing together the values. You can already accomplish this with: ``` js // OR them together where:...

For starters, you can call [`Schemator#availableDataTypes()`](http://www.js-data.io/docs/js-data-schema#availabledatatypes) and [`Schemator#availableRules()`](http://www.js-data.io/docs/js-data-schema#availablerules)

Take note, the new adapter specification in 3.x accomplishes something similar but in a different fashion. It uses methods that the user can override in order to pick or otherwise...

I've actually managed to extract a lot of common adapter functionality into a [base Adapter class](https://github.com/js-data/js-data-adapter), which saves a lot of boilerplate. If you take a look at say [js-data-mongodb...

I was thinking CircleCi supported setting up a test matrix like Travis, but my first skim of the docs didn't turn anything up

I've got the "Free and Open Source" setting turned on for js-data-sql, which apparently means that it gets 3 additional containers for a total of 4. Perhaps with that the...

I'm thinking rather than `{comments: {category_id: 1}}` we should do: ``` { relation: 'comments', // "relation" is either the "localField" or name of the related resource query: { category_id: 1...

The issue with `{comments: /* query syntax */}` is it has to be parsed using something like `Object.keys`, whereas `{ relation: 'comments' ...` gives instance information about which relation we're...