Jan Lübbe

Is there any news on this issue? Currently, no firmware update is offered, although I've not updated the FW so far. ``` % fwupdmgr get-updates Devices with no available firmware...

Ah, thanks. It seems that even after `fwupdmgr refresh --force` it needed some time to recognize the available updates. I now see: ``` ├─ThinkPad T14/P14s Gen 3 T16/P16s Gen 1...

I've force pushed to change the commit title to our convention.

Does this make it clearer which test case failed?

Thanks for your contribution! I understand your "protect against downgrades" use-case for a `min-version` in the `system.conf`. So far, we've pointed users at other ways this could be done: -...

> > Doing the bundle version comparison in RAUC itself would make it more explicit (which is good). > > Before reviewing the code, I'd like to discuss some high-level...

A different question: SemVer requires the version core to consist of exactly three parts. We've seen projects use date-based versions (such as `2024.05`, `2024.1` or similar). These would be rejected...

> > 6 failing and 10 successful checks > > looking through those logs... can't see how those should be fixed :-S are they false positives? Let's focus on the...

> > A different question: SemVer requires the version core to consist of exactly three parts. We've seen projects use date-based versions (such as `2024.05`, `2024.1` or similar). These would...

> > Hmm. I don't think `min-version`/`max-version` have symmetric use-cases. To me, `min-version` is about prohibiting downgrades. In that case, the running image is newer and the developer has the...