jean pierre Lerbscher

Your help will be appreciated.

After spending a few hours trying to understand the problem, I advise you to create a new declaration. Indeed the problem you encounter is related to the way the lexical...

This issue has been resolved.

I'm closing this issue because there are no new elements to try to diagnose the problem. You are free to reopen it if you can provide us with usable information.

I am closing this issue because the question that is being asked is not related to the use of Javaparser. If so, the question should be more specific.

Thank you for your suggestion, but it seems to me that what you're describing is very specific to your project and doesn't need to be integrated into JP.

This PR impacts too many files to validate it effectively. Furthermore, the hasModifier method is already implemented, notably all those which implement the NodeWithModifiers interface. It should be easy to...

> Yea it is, if you know what you are working with is source code that was parsed. But what should i do when i have a mix of javassist...

> And some implementations of the isStatic, isAbstract ... methods is just inconsistent between the javassist / reflection and the javaparser implementations. In this case you might be able to...

> Also how is it possible to implement something new, when the only answer is that it affects to many files, even tho in most of the files its just...