LAURENS Jérôme
LAURENS Jérôme
on unix ``` touch "a?b*c.text" ``` is legal...
Yes, just like soft links, only a common denominator should be supported. But things should also be made explicit and the final user should really have an info when an...
You can't just browse examples to see how things work Real life demos are more convincing and need less explanation. The underlying idea is to have l3build initialize some folder...
New feature I guess since it is not available in beamer 2021/05/26 v3.63
It does not work because '+(...)' has side effects. Next document creates 6 frames instead of 4 ``` \documentclass{beamer} \begin{document} \begin{frame} \insertslidenumber\\ \only{Should be from 2 to 2} \only{Should be...
That is not what I am asking for. Given a slide number a and a positive number n, I want some material to be displayed only from slide number a...
Another syntax proposal. Something like '\only {bla bla bla}' could mean "display bla bla bla 4 times starting at slide 10". `\only< -*(4)>{}` could mean "display bla bla bla 4...
As I said the `+` syntax does not work, unfortunately, the `.` syntax does not work either. ``` \documentclass{beamer} \begin{document} \begin{frame} \insertslidenumber\\ \begin{itemize} \item This is on the second and...
This does not work. Given `a` and `n` two positive integers, the question is to replace the syntax `` where `b==a+n-1` by a unique syntax that *only* depends on `a`...
@davidcarlisle I cannot use the dot either. What I want is something like ``` \only{Should be from 2 to 2} \only{Should be from 2 to 3} \only{Should be from 2...