empty do chain syntax

[jkrumbiegel]

Allows this

@chain begin
    ["hello", "world"]
    @chain map() do
        collect
        @chain filter() do
            uppercase
            _ ∉ ('E', 'L')
        end
        String
    end
end

instead of this

@chain begin
    ["hello", "world"]
    map(_) do x
        @chain x begin
            collect
            filter(_) do y
                @chain y begin
                    uppercase
                    _ ∉ ('E', 'L')
                end
            end
            String
        end
    end
end

[pdeffebach]

I don't hate this. It's kind of cool. But it is unnecessary in the sense that DataFramesMeta.jl doesn't really have a use-case for this kind of thing.

Could you give more examples for where this kind of feature would be useful?

[jkrumbiegel]

Dataframesmeta has no need for nesting, that's true. I've mostly needed better nesting when dealing with other collections, for example when doing string parsing or web scraping or things like that. There's really no good idiom to continue a chain at a lower nesting level, unless you skip out of the logic with a normal map, or put the chain in manually, but that loses the succinctness of the macro.

[max-sixty]

FWIW I've been using this branch for Advent of Code these past few days, where there's a decent amount of parsing and general transformations. I like it a lot, as discussed in https://github.com/jkrumbiegel/Chain.jl/issues/45. Here's an example:

links = @chain input begin
    strip
    split("\n")
    @chain map() do
        split("-")
        Pair(_...) 
        [_, _ |> reverse]
    end
    flatten
    collect
end

[max-sixty]

FWIW this just appeared on my notifications; it looks like the same design! https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-datapipes-jl/60734/61

[jkrumbiegel]

I posted the PR with the design on slack, possibly got it from there