Jody Klymak

https://matplotlib.org/devel/MEP/index.html But I'm not clear on the process. I added MEP process as an agenda item for the call on Monday https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/Matplotlib-meeting-agenda-aAmENlkgepgsMeDZtlsYu

Oops added to the agenda. 15:00 eastern us time.

See the two issues above for other relevant discussion: #10881 #10874

I think this misses the semantic difference between `s` in `scatter` and `markersize` in `plot`. In `scatter`, `s` is meant to be an array in `scatter`, whereas `markersize` cannot be...

My tendency is to be pretty conservative when it comes to multiple ways to do the same thing. I'd be very concerned about the Container returning different values for size...

@chahak13 does this still need discussion or do you have enough guidance?

I think our policy has been @rougier merges. It he can relinquish that if he likes, in which case I think one review is ok unless a re-architecture.

One thing I'm not clear on - for obcs they have a calculation for `OBCS_APPLY_SURF_DR`. I wasn't clear if this was needed here, or because I was directly manipulating `etaH`...

Thanks @mjlosch for taking a look. For my testing, did you run `exp4.nlfs` as-is, or did you modify at all?

Thanks - I can have a look in a few days.